The rumours stem from an interview with Musk’s father, Errol, who hinted that his son may be intrigued by the idea of acquiring the Premier League outfit.
Speaking to reporters, Errol Musk claimed: “I can’t comment on that – they’ll raise the price,” when asked if his son was actively pursuing a deal.
However, when pressed further, he admitted: “Oh, yes. But that doesn’t mean he’s buying it. He would like to, yes, obviously. Anybody would want to – so would I.”
Errol Musk cited family ties to Liverpool: “His grandmother was born in Liverpool, and we have relatives there.
“We were fortunate to know quite a lot of The Beatles because they grew up with some of my family. So, we are attached to Liverpool, you know.”
The comments sparked widespread debate online, with fans and pundits discussing the potential impact of the world’s richest man taking control of the Merseyside giants.
He had previously joked about buying Manchester United.
Despite the speculation, insiders close to Liverpool have played down the possibility of a sale, asserting that FSG has not received any approach from Musk.
Currently valued at £4.3 billion, Liverpool is the fourth most valuable football club globally.
While the figure represents just over one per cent of Musk’s estimated net worth, FSG remains committed to its stewardship, which has seen the club reclaim domestic and European glory.
Critics will argue that the group’s player spending has not matched expectations, but they remain one of the best operators in the transfer market.
While Musk’s interest in football ownership remains unconfirmed, his father’s interview has fuelled fresh discussions about his ambitions.
Beyond football, Musk’s recent political affiliations and controversial statements have drawn further scrutiny.
Liverpool must not allow the parasitic Musk an inch
Elon Musk’s recent stewardship of Twitter is a chilling example of his impulsive decision-making, erratic behaviour and disregard for long-term stability.
Since acquiring Twitter, Musk has engaged in chaotic and often offensive public pronouncements, alienating users, advertisers and employees alike.
He has implemented drastic and ill-conceived changes, leading to mass lay-offs, controversial policy shifts and the degradation of the platform.
Musk’s impulsive and often destructive approach to business could irreparably damage Liverpool.
His potential ownership would likely be characterised by unpredictable and destabilising changes, from player transfers and managerial appointments to club policies and fan engagement.
Musk could foster a toxic and divisive atmosphere, alienating fans, players and staff.
