The protracted Everton takeover has been shrouded in controversy, conspiracy and uncertainty since 777 Partners announced their intention to acquire the club.
According to Josimar, the American investment firm’s funding source has now been placed under the microscope amid questions regarding whether or not they can afford the takeover.
Underfire Toffees owner Farhad Moshiri has already pulled his funding from the financially troubled club after spending over £750 million during his tumultuous seven-year tenure.
Moshiri, who has constantly been met with backlash and criticism from the Everton supporters who have grown weary of his method of governing the club, has decided against spending another penny amid takeover talks.
While 777 are considered the favourites to purchase the club, the American investment firm may first need to get their house in order before finalising the takeover.
Everton fans have called for transparency about where the money will come from for 777’s proposed takeover, but the private equity’s source of funding continues to be shrouded in mystery.
The scepticism voiced by Everton supporters is understandable considering the estimated amount required to purchase and fully fund the club could potentially exceed £700m, which is well beyond 777’s current football investment capacity.
777 remains unperturbed by the inquisition from the club faithful, insisting that they have demonstrated proof of funds to the seller and its professional service advisors, Deloitte and Pinsent Masons.
They maintain that they are fully focused on working with the Premier League, Football Association and Financial Conduct Authority to acquire the regulatory approval required to finalise the transaction.
However, Josimar has revealed that a significant legal complaint surrounding 777’s source of funding has emerged. The complaint was filed on September 29 in the Court of Chancery in Delaware, USA.
The report adds that 777 founders Josh Wander and Steve Pasko, who were both present at Goodison Park during Everton’s defeat to Luton Town, have been named in the case.
This comes after Burnley, Leicester City and Leeds United threatened to sue the club for £300m in compensation based on losing top-flight income for a single season.
